Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Supreme Court Stays Illinois-Specific Injunction Against Public Charge Rule

myattorneyusa.com
On February 21, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the Federal Government's application to stay the preliminary injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the enforcement of its public charge final rule in Illinois [PDF version]. The vote in favor of the Government was 5-4, with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan voting to deny the application. The Supreme Court had already stayed a universal injunction against the rule that had been entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York [see blog]. With the Court's decision to stay the injunction that applied to Illinois alone, the Government will now apply the public charge final rule nationwide.

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it will implement the public charge rule in Illinois, as well as in the rest of the country, to all applications filed on or after February 24, 2020 [PDF version]. Applicants filing applications affected by the rule on or after February 24, 2020, must use the updated editions of affected forms [see blog]. We discuss the implementation of the rule in a separate post [see blog].

Although the Supreme Court has stayed the district court injunctions against the public charge final rule, thus allowing it to take effect for the time being, the litigation regarding the rule is ongoing in multiple Federal appellate courts across the country. We will update the site with further information about the litigation as it proceeds through the courts.

For those who are interested, please see our separate post on Justice Sotomayor's reasons for disagreeing with the Supreme Court's decision to stay the Illinois injunction against the public charge rule [see blog].

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Monday, March 9, 2020

New Public Charge Rule Takes Effect Nationwide

myattorneyusa.com
On February 24, 2020, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began implementing the public charge final rule, which it had published in August 2019, nationwide [PDF version]. The rule, which had originally been scheduled to take effect in 2019, had been subject to several Federal district court injunctions. The Supreme Court stayed a universal injunction [see blog] and an Illinois-only [see blog] injunction against the public charge rule, thus allowing it to take effect throughout the United States while the litigation continues.

We will write comprehensively about the new public charge rule in the near future. Below, we list some of the key points of the rule which applicants who are subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility must be aware of going forward.

  • The new public rule only applies to applications filed on or after February 24, 2020. Thus, applications that were properly filed before February 24, 2020, are not affected by the new public charge final rule. They will continue to be governed by prior public charge guidance [see article]. The USCIS is treating all references to “October 15, 2019” in the public charge rule, the originally intended effective date, as if they refer to “February 24, 2020.”
  • For those who are subject to the new public charge rule, the USCIS will not consider, and applicants and petitioners do not need to report, “the application for, certification or approval to receive, or receipt of certain previously excluded non-cash public benefits (such as SNAP, most forms of Medicaid, and public housing) before February 24, 2020.” The USCIS will also not consider the receipt of previously included public benefits before February 24, 2020, as a heavily-weighted negative factor in the public charge determination.
  • Extension of stay and change of nonimmigrant status applicants need not report affected public benefits received before February 24, 2020.
  • The new public charge rule does not apply to deportability on public charge grounds, which we discuss in a separate article [see article].
  • The new public charge rule defines the term “public charge” as an alien who has received one or more public benefits, as defined in the final rule, for more than 12 months within any 36 month period. The 12 months are counted cumulatively, and thus need not be consecutive.
  • The public charge rule defines the term “public benefits” as including any cash benefits for income maintenance, Supplemental Security income, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, most forms of Medicaid, and certain housing programs.
  • Adjustment of status applicants who are subject to the new public charge rule must file the new Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, when they file their Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.
  • Applicants and petitioners filing on or after February 24, 2020, must use the updated versions of USCIS forms affected by the public charge final rule. Using a prior edition of one of the forms will result in the denial of the application. We list the forms affected by the rule in a separate post [see blog].

The new public charge rule is a significant development in immigration law, creating a higher burden for family-sponsored cases and other cases where the public charge ground of inadmissibility is relevant. Petitioners and applicants should consult with an experienced immigration attorney for case-specific guidance on the effect of the new rule on their cases. We will update the site with comprehensive information about the new public charge rule in the near future.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Thursday, March 5, 2020

Coronavirus-Related Immigration and Travel Updates

myattorneyusa.com

Introduction


In this post, we will discuss recent immigration- and travel-related developments regarding the ongoing coronavirus outbreak.

China Travel Restrictions On Account of Coronavirus Remain in Effect


On January 31, 2020, President Donald Trump ordered temporary travel restrictions on foreign nationals who had been in China in the previous 14 days due to the ongoing coronavirus outbreak, which originated in China. The China travel restrictions due to the coronavirus remain in effect. We discuss these restrictions in a separate post [see article]. Please note that the restrictions do not apply to Hong Kong or Macau.

U.S. citizens are not subject to restrictions on their ability to return from China. Certain foreign nationals are also not subject to the coronavirus-related restrictions on entry. However, individuals returning from China are only allowed to fly to certain airports, will be screened upon return, and may be subject to restrictions on movement for 14 days after returning. For more details, please see the following information from the Centers for Disease Control [PDF version].

New Entry Restrictions Due to Coronavirus for Individuals Recently Present in Iran


On February 29, 2020, President Donald Trump published a new proclamation adding additional travel restrictions to Iran based on the coronavirus outbreak there [PDF version]. Iranian nationals are already subject to significant restrictions on entry to the United States as part of prior proclamations unrelated to the coronavirus outbreak [see article]. The prior restrictions ban the entry of Iranian nationals as immigrants and in most nonimmigrant categories absent waiver.

The coronavirus-related entry restrictions for Iran cover foreign nationals who were physically present in the Iran in the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States. The Iran coronavirus entry restrictions do not apply, however, to the following classes of foreign nationals:
  • U.S. lawful permanent residents;
  • The spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident;
  • The parent or legal guarding of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided that the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident is both unmarried and under the age of 21;
  • The sibling of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, provided both are unmarried and under the age of 21;
  • The child, foster child, or ward of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, or the prospective adoptee seeking to enter the United States under the IR-4 or IH-4 visa classifications;
  • Any alien traveling at the invitation of the United States Government for a purpose related to containment or mitigation of the coronavirus;
  • Any alien traveling as a C-1, D, or C-1/D nonimmigrant visa-holder as a crewmember or any alien otherwise traveling to the United States as air or sea crew;
  • Any alien seeking entry or transiting the United States as an A-1, A-2, C-2, C-3 (as a foreign government official or immediate family member of an official), E-1 (as an employee of TECRO or TECO or the employee's immediate family members), G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO-1, NATO-2, NATO-3, NATO-4, or NATO-6 (or seeking to enter as a nonimmigrant in one of those NATO categories);
  • Any alien whose travel falls within the scope of section 11 of the United Nations Headquarters Agreement;
  • Any alien whose entry, in the determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the Centers of Disease Control Director or his designee, would not pose a significant risk of introducing, transmitting, or spreading the coronavirus;
  • Any alien whose entry would further important United States law enforcement objectives, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees, based on the recommendation of the Attorney General or his designee;
  • Any alien whose entry would be in the national interest of the United States, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their designees;
  • Members of the U.S. Armed Forces and spouses and children of the U.S. Armed Forces.
The proclamation does not impair the ability of any foreign national to apply for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture.

It is worth noting that returnees from Iran, similarly to returnees from China, may be subject to monitoring or quarantine, at the discretion of responsible government agencies.

Travel Advisories and Possible Restrictions in the Future


At the time of the writing of this article, South Korea and Italy have the most ongoing coronavirus cases outside of China and Iran.

The White House has advised against travel to Italy and South Korea. The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has issued its highest level “do not travel” warning to Daegu, South Korea, and level 3 travel warnings to the rest of South Korea and all of Italy.

President Trump has stated that restrictions on entry for foreign nationals who have recently been to South Korea or Italy may be necessary in the near future. Furthermore, he has suggested that the United States may also find it necessary to close the Southwest border with Mexico.

We will update the website with more information as it becomes available. For the time being, individuals should avoid travel to South Korea and Italy if possible, and stay cognizant of the Department of State's and Center of Disease Control's guidance regarding travel to other parts of the world. Nonimmigrant travelers especially should be aware of the possibility that South Korea and Italy may soon be subject to similar restrictions as China and Iran due to the ongoing coronavirus outbreak.

Conclusion


Individuals considering travel abroad should continue to monitor relevant travel advisories from the U.S. Government. Future entry restrictions are possible depending on the course of the coronavirus worldwide. We will update the website with more information as it becomes available.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Monday, March 2, 2020

USCIS Will Not Pre-Paid Mailers for FY 2021 Cap Subject H1B Petitions

myattorneyusa.com
On February 14, 2020, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it “will not use pre-paid mailers to send out any communications or final notices for fiscal year 2021 cap-subject H1B petitions, including those requesting consideration under the advanced degree exemption” [PDF version].

The USCIS explained its decision. It has a fully automated process for printing and mailing cap-subject H1B petition approval notices by first-class mail. The use of pre-paid mailers requires the USCIS to implement a “more time-consuming manual process.” The USCIS believes that its existing automated process is more efficient for petitioners and for the USCIS.

Petitioners who are seeking to employ H1B workers, and prospective and current H1B workers, should consult with an experienced immigration attorney in the area of employment immigration for specific guidance regarding their cases. We discuss issues relating to the H1B program and other nonimmigrant work visa categories in a growing section on site [see category].

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com