Thursday, July 4, 2019

Texas Service Center Begins Processing Certain H1B Cap-Exempt Petitions

myattorneyusa.com
On May 20, 2019, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the Texas Service Center will begin processing certain Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker for certain H1B cap-exempt petitions [PDF version].

The Texas Service Center will process certain H1B cap-exempt petitions requesting:

  • A change in previously approved employment;
  • A change of employer;
  • Concurrent employment;
  • Amendments;
  • A continuation of previously approved employment without change with the same employer;
  • A change of status to H1B; or
  • Notification to a U.S. Consulate or inspection facility (port of entry or pre-flight inspection).

The Texas Service Center will not, however, process:

  • H1B petitions for cap-exempt entities [see article];
  • H1B petitions that are cap exempt based on a Conrad Waiver [see article] or an Interested Government Agency waiver under section 214(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; or
  • Petitions where the employer is located in Guam and the beneficiary will be performing services in Guam.

The Texas Service Center will share processing responsibilities for certain H1B cap-exempt petitions with the California Service Center, Vermont Service Center, and Nebraska Service Center. The purpose of the USCIS's change in processing policies is “to balance workloads and provide flexibility as USCIS works toward improving processing times and efficiency.”

Petitioners filing an H1B petition should always file the Form I-120 at the addresses indicated on the USCIS is Direct Filing Addresses for Form I-129 webpage, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker page. Beginning on July 19, 2019, the USCIS may reject any H1B petition filed at the wrong service center.

To learn more about the H1B category and other work visa categories, please see our website's growing sections on Work Visas [see category] and AC21 [see category].

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

President Trump Nominates Patrick Shanahan to be Secretary of Defense

myattorneyusa.com
On May 9, 2019, the White House Press Secretary's Office announced that President Donald Trump will nominate Patrick M. Shanahan to be the Secretary of Defense [link]. Shanahan has been serving as acting Secretary of Defense since January 1, 2019. Previously, he had been serving as the Deputy Secretary of Defense since July 19, 2017. Prior to serving in the Department of Defense, Shanahan was an executive at Boeing [PDF version].

Although the Department of Defense is not as significant in the immigration context as the Department of State, Department of Justice, or the Department of Homeland Security, it does affect immigration law in certain areas. The Department of Defense sets rules for aliens serving in the armed forces, as we have seen with the effective suspension of the MAVNI program over the last couple of years [see article]. The Department of Defense also advises the President on the national security and foreign relations implications of certain immigration decisions. In recent months, the Department of Defense has been assisting the Department of Homeland Security in enforcing the immigration laws along the Southwest border.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Summary of ICE Director Nominee Mark Morgan Interview

myattorneyusa.com
On May 5, 2019, President Donald Trump announced that he would nominate Mark Morgan to be the next Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [see blog]. In light of the news, it is worth examining an interview Morgan gave to The Epoch Times on April 24, 2019, just under two weeks before President Trump's announcement [link].[1] In this article, we will discuss the key points from the interview, which is well-worth reading in its entirety.

The following are some of the noteworthy statements from Morgan in his interview:

  • Morgan described the current situation at the border as a “crisis.”

  • Morgan supported President Trump's “Migrant Protection Protocol,” which requires certain individuals who seek asylum at a port of entry or after crossing the border illegally to wait in Mexico while their asylum applications are adjudicated. Morgan however agreed with the interviewer that if the Protocol is not applied across the entirety of the Southwest border, it will incentivize migrants to sneak across the border rather than apply for asylum at a port of entry. (The Migrant Protection Protocol is currently the subject of ongoing litigation.)

  • Morgan blamed the Flores Settlement Agreement (limits the amount of time that children can be kept in detention) and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act for incentivizing adults to bring children with them when crossing the border in order to secure their release from immigration detention. He added that this incentivizes fraud and the exploitation of children.

  • Morgan agreed with the interviewer that the uptick in border crossings from Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador is not attributable to increasing violence. He stated that the violence in those countries “ebbs and flows” while the number of crossings from those countries “continue[] to skyrocket.” He blamed Congress for its inability to address loopholes in the immigration system for the increasing number of crossings at the border from those Central American countries. He suggested that Congress' inaction is “based on their political agenda and their ideology.”

  • Morgan agreed that many migrants are being coached on what to say to pass credible fear interviews. Morgan stated that Mexican drug cartels “own” the Southwest border and that “they'll take the caravans, no matter how big or small, and they'll direct them to certain areas, so the Border Patrol can be engaged, and they'll sneak criminal aliens in and bad things in.” However, Morgan stated that the migrant caravans themselves are not actually started by cartels, but by “nongovernmental agencies and other nonprofit organizations…”

  • Morgan stated that despite the uptick in crossings of actual family units and unaccompanied alien children, many of the people crossing are “not all good.” For example, “[t]his year already, Border Patrol has apprehended as many gang members so far in the first six months [as] they did all of last year.” He added that the number of apprehensions does not tell the full story because “the border is still 60 percent wide open…” In addition to noting that the border does not have enough infrastructure, technology, and personnel, Morgan stated that “anywhere from 25 to 40 percent of Border Patrol resources are being pulled away and dedicated to the humanitarian side…” which allows cartels “[t]o bring drugs, contraband, and bad people in.” Morgan stated that when he was Border Patrol Chief during the final months of the Obama Administration, “about 15 percent of the Border Patrol agent resources were pulled off the line to do humanitarian tasks…”

  • Morgan stated that enforcement on the interior is a problem as well. He noted that deaths of U.S. citizens at the hands of “illegal aliens that had ICE detainers … that should not have been here … could have been prevented.”

  • Morgan stated that we should stop thinking that Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, and Congress are going to partner with the Administration in any short-term fixes to the crisis. He noted that the United States has given hundreds of millions of dollars to Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador and received no benefit in reducing the number of border crossings in return. He stated that Mexico has also not been a part of the solution despite repeated attempts by the U.S. government to work with them. He added that Congress has failed as well.

  • Morgan stated that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) should tighten the regulations on credible fear due to the overwhelming majority of claims that are ultimately found to be unsubstantiated.

  • Morgan stated that DHS needs to pass regulations to allow ICE to detain family units while they are going through the immigration process. He called for the re-imposition of “port courts” to process claims at the border quickly and remove those with no viable claims for relief or protection “immediately.”

  • Morgan stated that ICE must tighten interior enforcement to lessen the incentive for people from Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador to come to the United States. He restated his position that people from those countries come here primarily because of economic incentives or family reunification, not to escape conditions in their own countries.

  • Morgan complained about “judicial activism” blocking many of President Trump's immigration enforcement initiatives. He stated that he would advise President Trump to litigate many of his policies, such as the Migrant Protection Protocols, all the way to the Supreme Court.

  • Morgan took the position that the crisis at the border is worse than it was in the 90s despite lower overall numbers of crossings because of demographics. In the 1990s, the vast majority of border crossers were men who could be deported expeditiously, sometimes “being caught and sent back two to three times on the same day.” Due to current court orders and policies, family units and unaccompanied minors cannot be removed expeditiously, even if they ultimately have no viable claim for protection or relief. He added that many of the border crossers who are denied relief and protection and issued final orders of removal will remain in the United States and not comply with their final orders of removal.

Most of the interview with Morgan focused on border security. If he is confirmed as Director of ICE, his focus will be primarily on interior enforcement rather than border security. The interview does however highlight that Morgan sees interior enforcement as being intertwined with border security. For example, Morgan suggested that the prospect of remaining in the United States with better economic prospects is the primary cross of the large numbers of border crosses from Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, rather than violence in those countries. Thus, he sees interior enforcement as a way to deter many individuals from trying to come to the United States in the first place. Morgan also advocates abrogating the Flores Settlement Agreement to make it easier to detain family units with children pending the adjudication of their immigration cases.

Although Morgan served briefly in the Obama Administration, he has consistently expressed support for many of President Trump's efforts to tighten immigration enforcement. In the interview, he called for numerous regulatory changes to increase immigration enforcement as well as the litigation of ongoing district court injunctions against certain immigration policies all the way up to the Supreme Court. We can only presume that Morgan's support for these policies is why President Trump has decided to nominate him for the position of ICE Director.

We will update the website with more information about the Morgan nomination if and when it becomes available. To learn more about some of the issues discussed in this article, please see our website's sections on asylum and refugee protection [see category], removal and deportation defense [see category], and immigration detention [see category].

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

  1. Cuthbertson, Charlotte. “Obama's Border Patrol Chief: Border Crisis 'Worst in Our History.'” The Epoch Times. May 1, 2019. https://www.theepochtimes.com/former-border-patrol-chief-mark-morgan-border-crisis-worst-in-history_2896172.html

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Senate Confirms Two New Second Circuit Judges

myattorneyusa.com
On May 8 and May 9, the United States Senate confirmed two new judges to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit has federal appellate jurisdiction over New York, Connecticut, and Vermont, making it one of the more significant circuit courts for immigration cases [see article].

On May 8, the Senate confirmed Judge Joseph F. Bianco, 52, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to the Second Circuit by a vote of 54-42. Judge Bianco had served on the Eastern District since he was confirmed to that court in 2006. Prior to serving as a District Court Judge, Judge Bianco was a federal prosecutor, first for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, and second at the Criminal Division for the U.S. Department of Justice. Judge Bianco has a law degree from Columbia Law School.[1]

On May 9, the Senate confirmed Michael Park, 43, to the Second Circuit by a vote of 51-42. Park has spent most of his career in private practice, but he worked for two years as an Attorney Advisor for the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel during the administration of George W. Bush. He is currently a law professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. Park was a law clerk for then-Judge Samuel Alito on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 2001-02, and subsequently for Justice Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court of the United States in 2008-09. Judge-designate Park has a law degree from Yale Law School.[2]

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

  1. Severino, Carrie. “Who is Joseph Bianco?” National Review Online. Oct. 10, 2018. https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/who-is-joseph-bianco/
  2. Severino, Carrie. “Who is Michael Park?” National Review Online. Oct. 10, 2018. https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/who-is-michael-park/

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com